Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned judgment required interference in relation to the demand arising from truing up and special fuel surcharge in the context of proceedings under Section 54C of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The Court noticed reservations about the reasoning of the appellate tribunal and observed that the truing up, so far as fuel surcharge was concerned, occurred after the commencement of proceedings under Section 54C of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The same was observed in respect of the special fuel surcharge amount. The Court also noted that the amounts referred to in the demand order were not included in Form No. P10.
Outcome: No interference was called for and the appeal was dismissed.