Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment framed pursuant to approval under section 153D was sustainable when the approval was granted in a consolidated manner for multiple assessees and assessment years without indicating application of mind to each individual assessment record.
Analysis: The approval sought and granted under section 153D was in respect of a group of cases covering multiple assessees and assessment years. The order noted that the coordinate Benches had already examined the same approval process and held that, where the approval order does not reflect examination of the assessment records of each assessee separately, the approval suffers from non-application of mind and cannot be treated as valid in law. The present case was found to be indistinguishable on facts.
Conclusion: The approval under section 153D was held invalid for non-application of mind, and the assessment was quashed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned assessment could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A consolidated approval under section 153D that does not demonstrate consideration of the individual assessment record of each assessee and each assessment year is invalid for non-application of mind, rendering the assessment unsustainable.