TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>GST authorities must properly consider taxpayer responses instead of copying show cause notice contentions</h1> <h3>FILATEX INDIA LTD Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX CENTRAL DELHI EAST</h3> FILATEX INDIA LTD Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX CENTRAL DELHI EAST - TMI The Delhi High Court, in W.P.(C) 3602/2025, addressed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging the impugned Order-in-Original dated 31 January 2025, issued pursuant to a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 16 January 2023, which raised IGST demands against the Petitioner. The Court noted that the Order-in-Original and SCN were 'almost identically worded,' indicating the Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi East, 'has not applied its mind.' Although the Petitioner had filed a reply citing Rule 28 Second Proviso of CGST Rules and CBIC Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST (17 July 2023) to deny tax liability, the Order-in-Original failed to 'deal with the same in an appropriate manner.'The Court emphasized that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and since the matter requires 'detailed factual analysis' regarding the applicability of the circular and Rule 28, it declined to exercise writ jurisdiction. The Petitioner was permitted to file an appeal within 60 days, with the direction that the Appellate Authority 'shall consider the specific contentions... without being influenced by the findings given in the impugned Order-in-Original.'Further, the Court stressed that GST Adjudicating Authorities must 'take special note of the responses filed by the parties concerned and deal with the same appropriately and not simply reproduce the contentions in SCNs in their orders.' The petition was disposed of accordingly, with directions for communication of the order to all GST Commissionerates for compliance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
