Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order passed under Section 73 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 could be sustained when no opportunity of personal hearing was afforded, notwithstanding the absence of a written request by the taxpayer.
Analysis: Section 75(4) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 obliges the proper officer to afford a hearing before passing an order under Sections 73 or 74 where a written request is made or where an adverse decision is contemplated. Although no written request for hearing had been made and the taxpayer had not filed a response to the show-cause notice, the proposed adverse determination attracted the statutory requirement of hearing. In these circumstances, the absence of a personal hearing rendered the final order unsustainable.
Conclusion: The final order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision on merits after affording a personal hearing.