Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the delay in filing the appeals deserved condonation; (ii) whether the ex parte appellate orders should be set aside and the matters restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication.
Issue (i): Whether the delay in filing the appeals deserved condonation.
Analysis: The delay was supported by a condonation petition, the explanation was found to be genuine and bona fide, and no objection was raised by the Revenue.
Conclusion: The delay was condoned in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the ex parte appellate orders should be set aside and the matters restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The appellate orders were passed without the assessee's response. An affidavit stated non-receipt of notices in the reassessment and appellate proceedings. In view of the absence of effective opportunity and the ex parte nature of the orders, restoration was considered appropriate.
Conclusion: The ex parte orders were set aside and the appeals were restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication after affording opportunity to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained a remand to the first appellate authority, and the appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an appellate order is passed ex parte without effective notice or opportunity of hearing, the proper course is to set it aside and restore the matter for fresh adjudication.