Section 43B disallowance restored for fresh adjudication after inadequate appellate examination and hearing opportunity concerns.

Disallowance under section 43B was not properly examined by the first appellate authority, so the matter required reconsideration. The ITAT found the adjudication to be inadequate and restored the issue to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer for fresh decision in accordance with law. A meaningful opportunity of hearing was to be given to the assessee. The issue was therefore left open and not decided on merits for or against either side.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disallowance under section 43B was liable to be sustained when the first appellate authority had not adjudicated the issue properly and the matter required reconsideration.

Analysis: The disputed disallowance was found to have not been examined in a judicious manner by the first appellate authority. In the absence of proper adjudication, the matter warranted restoration to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer for decision in accordance with law, with a meaningful opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Conclusion: The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication and was not decided on merits in the assessee's favour or against it.

---