Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued to the petitioner as a witness under Section 179 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 could be quashed, and whether any violation of fundamental rights under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was made out.
Analysis: The notice was issued in aid of investigation in a registered criminal case and was directed to the petitioner in the capacity of a witness. The record indicated that the investigating agency was empowered to summon the witness for the purpose of inquiry and investigation. The Court also noted non-response to the summons and observed that the investigation had been stalled due to lack of cooperation. In these circumstances, no ground was shown for judicial interference in the notice.
Conclusion: The challenge to the witness summons was rejected and no violation of fundamental rights was found.