Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax could be demanded under Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 on air freight charges paid in Indian currency to Indian freight forwarder agents for import of goods, and whether such freight already included in customs assessable value could again be subjected to service tax.
Analysis: Liability under Section 66A arises only where the service received is one specified in Section 65(105) and is provided by a person established outside India to a recipient in India. The freight charges in question were paid to freight forwarder agents in India, who had arranged the transport service as agents of the aircraft operator. On the facts, the demand was not shown to be against the actual service provider contemplated by Section 66A. The freight element had also been included in the assessable value for customs duty under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, so the same component could not be subjected to service tax again.
Conclusion: The demand of service tax on the appellant was unsustainable and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.