Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of GST registration was sustainable when the show cause notice did not specify the grounds for proposed cancellation and the statutory period for reply was not allowed to expire.
Analysis: Rule 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 requires issuance of a show cause notice containing the reasons for proposed cancellation and grants seven working days for submission of a reply. The notice issued to the petitioner did not disclose any specific violation of the GST Act or the Rules and used only a general assertion of non-compliance. Though seven working days were granted, the cancellation order was passed before expiry of that period. The notice therefore did not satisfy the statutory requirements governing cancellation of registration.
Conclusion: The cancellation order could not be sustained and was quashed. The petitioner succeeded, while the authority was left free to initiate fresh proceedings by issuing a proper notice in accordance with law.