Prima facie no-manufacture view supported stay and waiver of pre-deposit in branded fuel blending appeals

Blending motor spirit and HSD with multifunctional additives to produce branded MS/HSD was treated as not amounting to manufacture on the Tribunal's earlier view, supported by a Board circular and interim orders in similar High Court matters. On that basis, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for stay and waiver of pre-deposit in respect of duty, interest and penalty pending appeal. Interim protection was granted subject to execution of a bond for the duty amount, with interest and penalty waived till disposal of the appeals and an expedited hearing directed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for stay and waiver of pre-deposit in respect of the duty demand, interest and penalty pending final disposal of the appeals.

Analysis: The Tribunal relied on its earlier view that blending motor spirit and HSD with multifunctional additives to produce branded MS/HSD does not amount to manufacture, and also took note of the Board circular supporting that position. In view of that precedent and the interim approach adopted by the Bombay High Court in similar matters, the Tribunal found that a prima facie case existed for grant of stay. It also considered the magnitude of the duty demand and the importance of the legal issue while directing an expedited hearing.

Conclusion: The appellants were granted stay, the duty pre-deposit was waived subject to execution of a bond for the duty amount, and the requirement regarding interest and penalty stood waived till disposal of the appeals.

Final Conclusion: Interim protection was granted in the appellants' favour, but the appeals themselves remained pending for final adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: Where binding or persuasive precedent shows that the process in question may not amount to manufacture, a prima facie case for stay and waiver of pre-deposit can be made out pending appeal.

---