TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The core legal questions considered in this judgment are:
2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS
Issue 1: Eligibility of Petitioners under the DTVSV Act despite disputed demand exceeding Rs. 5 crore in search-based assessments
Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 9(a)(i) of the DTVSV Act excludes from its scope "tax arrears" relating to assessment years where assessments have been made under Sections 143(3), 144, 153A, or 153C of the Income Tax Act on the basis of search initiated under Section 132 or 132A, if the disputed tax exceeds Rs. 5 crore. The CBDT's Circulars No.7 and No.9 of 2020 clarify that in such cases, the scheme's benefits are not available.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court noted that the petitioners' assessments were made under Section 143(3) following search operations under Section 132. The disputed tax, as per the assessment orders, exceeded Rs. 5 crore in both cases. The Court emphasized that the language of Section 9(a)(i) is clear and unambiguous, barring settlement where disputed tax exceeds Rs. 5 crore in search-based assessments.
Key Evidence and Findings: The petitioners had undisclosed incomes of Rs. 120 crores and Rs. 18 crores respectively, with tax and interest paid as per the assessment orders dated April 2017. Penalties under Section 271AAB were imposed and partly reduced on appeal but remain disputed in appeals pending before the Tribunal.
Application of Law to Facts: Since the disputed tax exceeded Rs. 5 crore and the assessments were search-based, the petitioners fall within the exclusion under Section 9(a)(i). The Court found that the petitioners' payment of tax pursuant to the assessments does not negate the fact that disputed tax exceeded the threshold, thereby disqualifying them from the scheme.
Treatment of Competing Arguments: The petitioners argued that the exclusion applies only to disputed tax and not to disputed penalty, and that their cases fall under the category of disputed penalty eligible for settlement under Section 3(c) of the DTVSV Act. They also relied on various Supreme Court and High Court decisions supporting broader eligibility and the beneficial nature of the scheme.
The Court rejected these submissions, holding that the exclusion in Section 9(a)(i) applies to "tax arrears" which includes disputed tax, interest, and penalty as defined in Section 2(1)(o). Since the assessments were search-based and disputed tax exceeded Rs. 5 crore, the petitioners are excluded from the scheme.
Conclusion: The petitioners are not eligible to settle their disputes under the DTVSV Act due to the exclusion under Section 9(a)(i) for search-based assessments with disputed tax exceeding Rs. 5 crore.
Issue 2: Interpretation of "disputed tax," "disputed penalty," and "tax arrears" under the DTVSV Act
Relevant Legal Framework: Section 2(1)(j) defines "disputed tax" as income tax payable by the appellant, including surcharge and cess, computed based on pending appeals or orders. Section 2(1)(i) defines "disputed penalty" as penalties determined where appeals have been filed and which are not levied on disputed income or tax. Section 2(1)(o) defines "tax arrear" as aggregate disputed tax, interest, penalty, disputed interest, disputed penalty, or disputed fee.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court observed that "disputed tax" refers strictly to income tax payable and is distinct from "disputed penalty." The exclusion in Section 9(a)(i) applies to "tax arrears," a term encompassing disputed tax and disputed penalty, among other components. Therefore, the exclusion is not limited to disputed tax alone but includes disputed penalty where it forms part of tax arrears.
Application of Law to Facts: The petitioners' disputes involve both tax and penalty components. The Court found that the exclusion applies because the disputed tax component alone exceeds Rs. 5 crore, thus barring the entire tax arrear from settlement under the scheme.
Treatment of Competing Arguments: The petitioners contended that disputed penalty alone qualifies for settlement under Section 3(c), irrespective of the disputed tax amount. The Court rejected this, emphasizing the holistic definition of "tax arrear" and the clear statutory exclusion.
Conclusion: The definitions in the DTVSV Act support the exclusion of the petitioners' disputes from the scheme, as the disputed tax component exceeds Rs. 5 crore, thereby excluding the entire tax arrear including penalties.
Issue 3: Effect of payment of tax by petitioners on their eligibility under the DTVSV Act
Relevant Legal Framework: The DTVSV Act contemplates settlement of disputes pending before appellate forums, regardless of whether demand is paid or unpaid. The scheme requires withdrawal of appeals and payment of amounts as per the Act.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court held that payment of tax pursuant to assessment orders does not alter the fact that the disputed tax amount exceeded Rs. 5 crore. The exclusion under Section 9(a)(i) applies based on the amount of disputed tax in the assessment year, not on the payment status.
Application of Law to Facts: The petitioners had paid tax and interest as per the assessments, but the disputed tax amount in the assessments was above the threshold. Hence, payment does not confer eligibility under the scheme.
Conclusion: Payment of tax post-assessment does not confer eligibility for settlement under the DTVSV Act where the disputed tax exceeds Rs. 5 crore in search-based assessments.
Issue 4: Binding nature and effect of CBDT Circulars No.7 and No.9 of 2020 clarifying exclusions under the DTVSV Act
Relevant Legal Framework: Circulars issued by CBDT under Sections 10 and 11 of the DTVSV Act serve as directions/orders to clarify provisions and remove difficulties. Though not binding as law, they are contemporanea expositio and hold persuasive value in interpreting the statute.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court gave due weight to the CBDT Circulars, which consistently clarify that search-based assessments with disputed tax exceeding Rs. 5 crore are excluded from the scheme. The Court observed that these clarifications reflect the legislative intent and aid in interpreting the statute.
Application of Law to Facts: The petitioners' cases fall squarely within the exclusion clarified by the Circulars, reinforcing the Court's interpretation of Section 9(a)(i).
Conclusion: The CBDT Circulars, as contemporanea expositio, support the exclusion of the petitioners' cases from the DTVSV Act scheme.
Issue 5: Applicability of precedents cited by petitioners in support of eligibility
Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The petitioners cited multiple Supreme Court and High Court decisions emphasizing the beneficial nature of tax amnesty schemes and broader eligibility.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court acknowledged the beneficial nature of the scheme but emphasized that the statutory exclusion under Section 9(a)(i) is clear and overrides such considerations. The Court noted that the precedents do not override explicit statutory provisions excluding certain categories from the scheme.
Conclusion: The petitioners' reliance on precedents does not override the clear exclusion under the statute and hence does not entitle them to relief.
3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS
"There is no ambiguity in the language in Section 9(a)(i) of the Direct Tax Act Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020."
"The expression 'disputed tax' in Section 2(j) means the income tax payable by the appellant under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961."
"The exclusion in Section 9(a)(i) of the Direct Tax Act Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 will apply in respect of 'tax arrear' where orders have been passed under Section 143(3), Section 144 or Section 153A or Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where the disputed tax exceeds Rs. 5,00,00,000/-."
"Merely because the respective Writ Petitioners have paid the tax by admitting to the undisclosed income pursuant to the assessment that was completed under Section 143(3) ... ipso facto would not mean that the 'disputed tax' did not exceed Rs. 5,00,00,000/-."
"The clarification of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) though not binding on this Court are to be considered as Contemporanea expositio of law."
"Therefore, I do not find any merits in these Writ Petitions merely because the respective Writ Petitioners have paid the tax pursuant to the search conducted in the respective Assessment Orders."
Core principles established include the strict interpretation of statutory exclusions under the DTVSV Act, the comprehensive definition of "tax arrears" including disputed penalty, and the recognition of CBDT Circulars as authoritative clarifications guiding the application of the scheme.
Final determinations:
TaxTMI 
