Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on the basis of an admitted service tax liability quantified and accepted before the cut-off date, despite the department's later rejection on the ground that the dues were not finally quantified.
Analysis: The petitioner's director had, during investigation, admitted unpaid service tax liability of Rs. 72.37 lakhs for the relevant period and the same figure was thereafter carried into the declaration, the committee's estimate, and the subsequent response in the scheme forms. The later rejection rested on a ground not found in the impugned order's operative basis and, in any event, the scheme required a bona fide admission of tax dues before the cut-off date, not mathematical precision or completion of adjudication by issuance of a later show cause notice. The Court applied the scheme's object of resolving legacy disputes and followed the principle that admitted dues, if identified before the cut-off date, satisfy the threshold for eligibility under the enquiry/investigation category.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held eligible to avail the scheme, the rejection of the declaration was quashed, and the respondents were directed to process the declaration afresh and issue the discharge certificate on payment of the balance amount.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the legacy dispute resolution scheme, eligibility depends on a pre-cut-off-date admission of tax dues, and such admission need not match the department's later quantification with exact mathematical precision.