Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (6) TMI 712 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Supreme Court Examines Tax Deduction Denial Under Section 80P, Affirms Taxpayer Rights in Late Return Filing Scenario The SC analyzed the jurisdiction of the Central Processing Centre (CPC) to disallow deductions under section 80P for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Tribunal ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Supreme Court Examines Tax Deduction Denial Under Section 80P, Affirms Taxpayer Rights in Late Return Filing Scenario

                            The SC analyzed the jurisdiction of the Central Processing Centre (CPC) to disallow deductions under section 80P for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Tribunal ruled that the CPC lacked authority to deny deductions for late return filing, as the relevant amendment in the Finance Act, 2021 was prospective and applied only from A.Y. 2021-22 onwards. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, reversing the CPC's disallowance of the deduction.




                            1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                            The core legal question considered by the Tribunal was whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) had the jurisdiction and authority under section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") to disallow the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P of the Act during the processing of the return for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19. Specifically, the issue was whether the CPC could deny the deduction on the ground that the return was not filed within the due date prescribed under section 139(1) of the Act, given that the amendment empowering such disallowance was introduced only by the Finance Act, 2021, effective from 01.04.2021 (i.e., applicable to A.Y. 2021-22 onwards).

                            2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                            Issue: Jurisdiction and power of CPC to disallow deduction under section 80P of the Act in return processed under section 143(1)(a) for A.Y. 2018-19

                            Relevant legal framework and precedents:

                            Section 80P of the Income Tax Act provides for deduction in respect of income of cooperative societies engaged in certain specified activities. Section 143(1)(a) of the Act empowers the CPC to process returns and make adjustments or disallowances of certain deductions or claims if they are found to be incorrect or incomplete.

                            The Finance Act, 2021 introduced an amendment effective from 01.04.2021, inserting clause (v) in section 143(1)(a), which explicitly empowers the CPC to disallow deductions under Chapter VI-A, including section 80P, if the return is not filed within the due date specified under section 139(1). Prior to this amendment, no such express power was conferred on the CPC to disallow section 80P deductions on this ground during return processing.

                            The Tribunal relied on a Coordinate Bench decision in the case of Finolex Industries Ltd. Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. vs. ITO (ITA No. 76/PUN/2023 dated 03.04.2023), which held that for assessment years prior to the amendment (i.e., before A.Y. 2021-22), the CPC had no power under section 143(1)(a) to disallow deductions under section 80P on the ground of late filing of return under section 139(1). The Tribunal noted that the amendment was prospective and could not be applied retrospectively.

                            Court's interpretation and reasoning:

                            The Tribunal emphasized that the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 was prospective in nature and applied only to returns filed for assessment years commencing on or after 01.04.2021. Since the assessment year under consideration was 2018-19, the CPC lacked jurisdiction to disallow the deduction claimed under section 80P during the processing of the return under section 143(1)(a).

                            The Tribunal further noted that the appellant (assessee) had filed the return on 27.11.2018 and claimed the deduction under section 80P. The CPC disallowed the deduction on the ground that the necessary schedules were not filled and the return was not filed within the due date under section 139(1). However, the Tribunal found that the power to disallow such deduction on this ground was introduced only by the Finance Act, 2021, and thus the CPC's action was not legally sustainable for the A.Y. 2018-19.

                            Key evidence and findings:

                            The Tribunal examined the return filing date, the deduction claimed, the CPC's intimation under section 143(1)(a), and the amendment timeline. The key finding was that the CPC's disallowance was based on a legal provision not in force at the relevant time.

                            Application of law to facts:

                            Applying the above legal framework, the Tribunal held that since the amendment empowering the CPC to disallow deductions under section 80P for late filing was effective only from 01.04.2021, the CPC could not exercise such power for A.Y. 2018-19. Therefore, the disallowance made by the CPC was not valid and had to be reversed.

                            Treatment of competing arguments:

                            The ld. CIT(A) had upheld the CPC's disallowance, relying on the general power of the CPC under section 143(1) to make adjustments and on certain decisions which had not attained finality. The Tribunal rejected this view, holding that the specific amendment in Finance Act, 2021 was determinative and took precedence over general powers. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant had not filed additional grounds or evidence before the CIT(A), but this did not affect the jurisdictional issue.

                            Conclusions:

                            The Tribunal concluded that the CPC was not justified in disallowing the deduction under section 80P for A.Y. 2018-19 during return processing under section 143(1)(a) of the Act. The disallowance was based on a provision effective only from A.Y. 2021-22 onwards and was thus beyond the CPC's jurisdiction for the year in question.

                            3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                            "Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act spells out that if any deduction is claimed under any of the provisions of Chapter VI-A which include deduction u/s 80P such deduction has to be allowed only if the return is filed within due date specified under sub-section 139(1) of the Act. In other words, if any return is filed beyond due date u/s 139(1) of the Act then no deduction u/s 80P shall be allowed. However, clause (v) was inserted by the Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f. 01-04-2021. The case of the assessee, on the other hand, is for F.Y. 2018-19 relevant to A.Y. 2019-20 which is the period prior to amendment brought in by the Finance Act, 2021. Before this amendment, clause (v) did not include and cover deduction u/s 80P. So therefore, in the present Case of the assessee though admittedly return was filed beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 139(1) of the Act but still section 143(1)(a)(v) is not applicable to the assessee since the case of the assessee is for A.Y. 2019-20, which is before the amendment."

                            Core principles established include the prospective application of statutory amendments and the limitation of CPC's powers under section 143(1)(a) to the provisions in force at the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal reaffirmed that the CPC cannot disallow deductions under section 80P for returns filed late prior to the Finance Act, 2021 amendment.

                            Final determination was that the CPC's disallowance of deduction under section 80P for A.Y. 2018-19 was not sustainable, and the deduction must be allowed. The appeal was allowed accordingly, reversing the orders of the CIT(A) and the CPC.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found