Service tax valuation excludes customer reimbursements; Rule 5 could not support inclusion of pass-through freight and port charges.

Reimbursements received from customers towards port payments, freight, transport and weighment charges were held not includible in the taxable value of service tax. The analysis applies the principle that service tax under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 is confined to the value of services actually rendered, and not to amounts recovered merely as reimbursement. Rule 5 of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2000 was treated as beyond the scope of the charging provision, so a demand based on that rule could not survive. On the facts, the receipts were regarded as pass-through reimbursements rather than consideration for an independent taxable service, and the assessee succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether reimbursements received from customers towards port payments, freight payments, transport charges and weighment charges were taxable as part of the value of taxable services, and whether Rule 5 of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2000 could sustain the demand.

Analysis: The demand rested on the premise that reimbursed amounts formed part of the taxable value, and that the difference between expenditure and recovery justified inclusion in the gross amount charged. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court has held Rule 5 of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2000 to be beyond the scope of Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994, because service tax can be levied only on the value of services actually rendered and not on amounts recovered merely as reimbursement. On the facts, the amounts received by the appellant were treated as reimbursements from customers and not as consideration for an independent taxable service rendered by the appellant.

Conclusion: The reimbursements were not includible in the taxable value and the demand based on Rule 5 could not survive; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

---