Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (5) TMI 1784 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Registration denied under section 12AB for trust benefiting particular religious community without proper documentation ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the assessee's appeal challenging denial of registration under section 12AB. The CIT(E) found that many trust objects benefited a ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Registration denied under section 12AB for trust benefiting particular religious community without proper documentation

                            ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the assessee's appeal challenging denial of registration under section 12AB. The CIT(E) found that many trust objects benefited a particular religious community. The tribunal upheld the denial as the assessee failed to provide translated copies of the trust deed and amended trust deed pending with Joint Charity Commissioner. Without these documents showing the trust's objects and revised objects, the tribunal distinguished the case from precedent relied upon by the assessee and confirmed the CIT(E)'s order.




                            1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                            The core legal questions considered in this appeal are:

                            (a) Whether the Trust qualifies for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, given that its objects appear to benefit a particular religious community or caste, specifically "Vaishnav Sadhu (Bava Vairagi)".

                            (b) Whether the provisions of section 13(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act apply to the Trust, thereby disqualifying it from exemption under sections 11 and 12, on the ground that the Trust is created for the benefit of a particular religious community or caste.

                            (c) Whether the Trust's activities are purely religious or charitable in nature, and the consequent impact on its eligibility for registration and exemption.

                            (d) The legal effect of the Trust's pending application for amendment of its Trust Deed under the Bombay Public Trust Act, vis-`a-vis the current application for registration under section 12AB.

                            2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                            Issue (a) and (b): Applicability of Section 13(1)(b) and Eligibility for Registration under Section 12AB

                            Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act governs the registration of trusts for claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12. Section 13(1)(b) disqualifies a trust from exemption if it is created or established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste, provided the trust is charitable in nature and created after the commencement of the Act.

                            The Tribunal referred extensively to the Supreme Court's rulings, notably:

                            • CIT vs. Palghat Shadi Mahal Trust, which held that section 13(1)(b) applies to charitable trusts benefiting a particular religious community, thereby disqualifying them from exemption.
                            • CIT vs. Dawoodi Bohara Jamat, which clarified that section 13(1)(b) applies even to composite trusts (both religious and charitable). The Court held that trusts established for charitable purposes benefiting a particular religious community or caste are excluded from exemption under section 11.

                            Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) observed that the Trust's objects, as per the original Trust Deed dated 1995, are charitable but restricted to benefit members of the "Vaishnav Sadhu (Bava Vairagi)" caste. This restriction invokes section 13(1)(b), which disqualifies the Trust from exemption.

                            The assessee contended that the Trust's activities are purely religious and that an amendment to the Trust Deed is pending, which would remove the restrictive caste-based benefit. However, the CIT(E) held that the pending amendment could not be considered, and the Trust's current objects do not reflect religious purposes but charitable ones restricted to a particular caste, thus attracting section 13(1)(b).

                            Key evidence and findings: The Trust Deed's objects explicitly mention educational, financial, medical, and cultural assistance restricted to members of a particular caste. The assessee's admission that the application form mistakenly mentioned "charitable" instead of "religious" further complicated the matter.

                            Application of law to facts: Since the Trust's objects are charitable but limited to a particular caste, the legal provisions under section 13(1)(b) apply, barring exemption under sections 11 and 12. The pending amendment to the Trust Deed was not considered as it was not yet effected.

                            Treatment of competing arguments: The assessee argued that the Trust is religious in nature and that the amendment would rectify the restrictive objects. The Tribunal noted the absence of a translated copy of the Trust Deed or the amended deed, diminishing reliance on the assessee's submissions and prior decisions involving different facts.

                            Conclusions: The Trust does not qualify for registration under section 12AB as per the current Trust Deed, due to the application of section 13(1)(b) which disqualifies charitable trusts benefiting a particular religious community or caste from exemption.

                            Issue (c): Nature of Activities - Religious or Charitable

                            Relevant legal framework and precedents: The distinction between religious and charitable trusts is critical under the Income Tax Act, as section 13(1)(b) applies only to charitable trusts benefiting a particular community, not to purely religious trusts.

                            The Supreme Court in CIT vs. Dawoodi Bohara Jamat examined composite trusts and held that even if some objects are religious, the charitable objects restricted to a community trigger section 13(1)(b).

                            Court's interpretation and reasoning: The CIT(E) concluded that the Trust's objects are not purely religious but charitable in nature, as they include educational, financial, and medical assistance restricted to a caste. Hence, the Trust does not qualify as a religious trust exempt from section 13(1)(b).

                            Key evidence and findings: The objects in the Trust Deed, such as promoting education, providing financial help, medical assistance, and managing properties for the benefit of the caste members, were identified as charitable rather than religious activities.

                            Application of law to facts: Since the activities are charitable but restricted to a particular caste, the Trust falls within the ambit of section 13(1)(b) and is not eligible for exemption.

                            Treatment of competing arguments: The assessee's claim of purely religious activities was rejected due to the nature and wording of the objects.

                            Conclusions: The Trust's activities are charitable and restricted to a caste, attracting disqualification under section 13(1)(b).

                            Issue (d): Effect of Pending Amendment of Trust Deed

                            Relevant legal framework: Amendments to Trust Deeds require approval and registration with the Charity Commissioner. Until such amendments are effected, the original Trust Deed governs the Trust's objects and eligibility.

                            Court's interpretation and reasoning: The CIT(E) and the Tribunal held that the pending amendment cannot be considered for deciding the current application for registration under section 12AB. The Trust must be evaluated based on the existing Trust Deed.

                            Key evidence and findings: The assessee admitted that the amendment application is pending and not yet approved.

                            Application of law to facts: The Trust's eligibility must be assessed on the current Trust Deed, which restricts benefits to a particular caste, invoking section 13(1)(b).

                            Treatment of competing arguments: The assessee's reliance on the pending amendment and prior Tribunal decisions involving different facts was not accepted due to lack of supporting documents and factual distinctions.

                            Conclusions: Pending amendments do not affect the present application; the Trust's current objects disqualify it from registration.

                            3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                            The Tribunal upheld the denial of registration under section 12AB based on the following crucial legal reasoning:

                            "Provision of sec 13(1)(b) of the Act is applicable to the applicant/assessee. Section 13(1)(b) of the Act stipulates that provisions of sec 11 and 12 would not apply in the case of a trust for charitable purposes... if the trust or institution is created or established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste."

                            "From the phraseology in clause (b) of section 13(1), it could be inferred that the Legislature intended to include only the trusts established for charitable purposes. That however does not mean that if a trust is a composite one... it would not be covered by clause (b). What is intended to be excluded from being eligible for exemption under Section 11 is a trust for charitable purpose which is established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste."

                            "In that view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the respondent-trust is a charitable and religious trust which does not benefit any specific religious community and therefore, it cannot be held that Section 13(1)(b) of the Act would be attracted... and thereby it would be eligible to claim exemption under Section 11 of the Act." (Supreme Court ruling applied by analogy)

                            "From the above referred discussion and objects of the applicant/assessee it is evident that it is not a religious trust, but it is a charitable trust and above referred objects, which are in the nature of charitable is restricted to benefit of a particular religious community or caste... and therefore as per law... the provision of sec 13(1)(b) would be applicable and therefore the applicant/assessee would not be eligible for exemption u/s 11 of the Act."

                            The Tribunal concluded that the Trust's application for registration under section 12AB is rightly rejected and provisional registration cancelled, confirming the CIT(E)'s order.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found