TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Special leave petition seeking Article 136 intervention against impugned decision dismissed for lack of manifest error</h1> The dominant issue was whether the SC should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 to interfere with the impugned decision. The Court ... Condonation of delay - jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India - HELD THAT:- Delay condoned. No case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. The Supreme Court, with Hon'ble Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan presiding, heard the petitioners represented by senior counsel Ms. Nisha Bagchi and others, and the respondents represented by multiple advocates. The Court 'condoned delay' but held that 'no case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.' Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. The Court clarified that 'other remedies of the petitioners for recovery in accordance with law are kept open.' Any pending application was also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
