Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under the head income from house property by adopting a percentage of investment as annual letting value and by denying vacancy allowance was sustainable.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under section 23 requires the deemed value of property to be linked to the rent for which it might reasonably be expected to let from year to year, and not to the investment cost. The assessing authority adopted an investment-based formula without undertaking the requisite enquiry into expected rental value and also did not grant vacancy allowance. The appellate record further showed computational errors and the material did not justify sustaining the entire addition as confirmed in first appeal.
Conclusion: The addition was held to be unsustainable in full and was restricted to a lump sum estimate of Rs. 2 lakhs, with the balance deleted. The assessee succeeded partly.