Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2009 (10) TMI 421 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Compensatory interest and crystallised liability determine deductibility of delayed tax and royalty payments under section 37(1). For deduction under section 37(1), the substance of an impost prevails over contractual labels: interest automatically charged for delayed sales tax ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Compensatory interest and crystallised liability determine deductibility of delayed tax and royalty payments under section 37(1).

                          For deduction under section 37(1), the substance of an impost prevails over contractual labels: interest automatically charged for delayed sales tax payment is compensatory, not penal, and is deductible as business expenditure. A liability for royalty-related interest becomes deductible when it is finally determined and crystallised in the relevant accounting year, even if the dispute arose earlier. Interest on interest for belated royalty payment was treated as compound interest arising from delay, not a penal levy, and was allowable when the liability crystallised under the mercantile system. The governing test is whether the outgoing is compensatory in substance and whether the liability has crystallised in the relevant year.




                          Issues: (i) Whether interest paid on belated payment of sales tax, described in the lease deed as penalty, was compensatory and deductible under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) Whether the liability to pay interest on royalty to the Raja of Kutlehar crystallised in the relevant year; (iii) Whether interest on interest for belated payment of royalty was a deductible revenue expenditure and crystallised in the relevant year.

                          Issue (i): Whether interest paid on belated payment of sales tax, described in the lease deed as penalty, was compensatory and deductible under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Analysis: Deductibility under section 37(1) depends on whether the impost is laid out wholly and exclusively for business and is not of a penal character. The character of the impost is determined by its substance and the statutory scheme, not merely by the nomenclature used in the contract. Where interest is automatically attracted for delayed payment, it is compensatory in nature. The lease deed had to be read with section 17A(1) of the H. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1968, under which delayed tax payment carried simple interest. The amount claimed matched the statutory interest liability.

                          Conclusion: The interest on delayed payment of sales tax was compensatory and allowable as a deduction; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the liability to pay interest on royalty to the Raja of Kutlehar crystallised in the relevant year.

                          Analysis: A liability becomes deductible when it is finally determined and crystallised, even if the dispute originated earlier. The dispute over the royalty-related liability was finally settled by the judicial order dated 10 January 1996, and that settlement fixed the amount payable in the relevant accounting year. The question was therefore treated as one of crystallisation of liability rather than a substantial question of law warranting a different conclusion.

                          Conclusion: The liability crystallised in the relevant year and the deduction was allowable; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iii): Whether interest on interest for belated payment of royalty was a deductible revenue expenditure and crystallised in the relevant year.

                          Analysis: Interest on interest was treated as compound interest arising from delayed payment of royalty rather than as a penal impost. On the facts, the liability related to an earlier period but was finally quantified and settled only when the dispute ended and the amount was paid during the relevant assessment year. Since the assessee followed the mercantile system, the deduction was allowable in the year in which the liability crystallised.

                          Conclusion: The interest on interest was deductible and the liability crystallised in the relevant year; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

                          Final Conclusion: The appeals failed because the disputed amounts were held to be compensatory or otherwise deductible business expenditure, and the liability in question was found to have crystallised in the relevant year.

                          Ratio Decidendi: For section 37(1) deductions, the decisive test is whether a statutory impost is compensatory or penal in substance, and a liability becomes deductible when it crystallises in the relevant accounting year.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found