Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether guarantee commission paid to a director for standing as guarantor for a bank loan was allowable as a deduction in computing taxable income; (ii) Whether interest paid on arrears of cane purchase tax was allowable as revenue expenditure.
Issue (i): Whether guarantee commission paid to a director for standing as guarantor for a bank loan was allowable as a deduction in computing taxable income.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the binding principle governing allowability of such business expenditure on the facts stated in the reference, and the disallowance could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The question is answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether interest paid on arrears of cane purchase tax was allowable as revenue expenditure.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the governing legal principle on deduction of interest paid on such statutory arrears as revenue expenditure, and the disallowance was not justified.
Conclusion: The question is answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: Both referred questions were answered for the assessee, and the reference was disposed of accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing precedent treats the expenditure as a permissible business deduction or revenue outgo on the stated facts, the corresponding disallowance cannot be sustained.