Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petitions After Substantial Filing Delays, Citing Lack of Compelling Justification for Extended Timelines SC dismissed SLPs due to unexplained gross delay of 274 and 246 days in filing. The Court found no satisfactory explanation for the delay and no merit ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petitions After Substantial Filing Delays, Citing Lack of Compelling Justification for Extended Timelines
SC dismissed SLPs due to unexplained gross delay of 274 and 246 days in filing. The Court found no satisfactory explanation for the delay and no merit warranting interference with HC's orders. Consequently, the SLPs were dismissed both on grounds of delay and merits, with all pending applications disposed of.
The Supreme Court, through Hon'ble Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, dismissed the Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) due to an unexplained gross delay of 274 and 246 days in filing. The Court held that "there is a gross delay... which has not been satisfactorily explained," and additionally found no merit warranting interference with the High Court's impugned orders. Consequently, the SLPs were dismissed both "on the ground of delay as well as on merits," and all pending applications were disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
