TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Rejects Petitions Over Excessive Filing Delay, Emphasizing Timely Legal Procedures and Procedural Discipline</h1> <h3>ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-31, DELHI Versus SATYA PAL ARYA</h3> ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-31, DELHI Versus SATYA PAL ARYA - TMI The Supreme Court, through Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, dismissed the Special Leave Petitions due to a 'gross delay of 250, 215 and 267 days respectively' in filing, which was 'not satisfactorily explained by the petitioners.' Additionally, the Court found 'no good reason to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the High Court.' Consequently, the petitions were dismissed both 'on the ground of delay as well as merits,' and all pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 