Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the activities undertaken by the statutory forest department in conducting eco-tourism, jungle safari, sightseeing and accommodation facilities amounted to taxable tour operator service or short-term accommodation service.
Analysis: The activities were found to be carried out under the governing wildlife statute as part of the department's statutory role in conservation, eco-system protection and maintenance of tiger habitats. The fees collected were prescribed by the Government and were credited and utilised for conservation and related welfare purposes. In that setting, the Board's clarification on services performed by a sovereign/public authority under law supported the view that such statutory functions do not become taxable merely because charges are collected.
Conclusion: The activities were not taxable as tour operator service or short-term accommodation service, and the demand could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on merits and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Activities performed by a statutory/public authority in discharge of duties imposed by law, with charges collected and used only for the statutory purpose, do not constitute taxable business services merely because consideration is received.