Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the building tax assessment and consequential revenue recovery proceedings was maintainable when no statutory appeal or revision had been invoked, and whether the assessing authority could be asked to reconsider the completed assessment.
Analysis: The assessment under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 had already been completed. After passing the assessment order, the assessing authority had no further jurisdiction over the matter for purposes of building tax, and the proper course for an aggrieved person was to pursue the remedies of appeal and revision provided under the Act. In the absence of resort to those statutory remedies, the assessment had attained finality. The petitioner had also acted upon the assessment by making part payment, and a later request to accept only a portion of the assessed amount in full satisfaction of the tax was not legally sustainable. On these facts, invocation of writ jurisdiction was not justified.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable on merits and was dismissed.