Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the orders passed under Section 74 of the GST Act and in appeal were liable to be set aside for want of opportunity of hearing, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The petitioners complained that the hearing notice was not effectively made available and that the orders were passed without granting a real opportunity to be heard. The State did not dispute the timing of the hearing notice vis-a -vis the period granted for filing reply. In these circumstances, the lack of effective hearing amounted to a breach of the principles of natural justice, and no useful purpose would be served by relegating the petitioners to the appellate remedy.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh decision after affording an opportunity of hearing.