TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal denies rectification of order in Excise Appeal pre-Supreme Court judgments</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MEERUT-I Versus AMRIT VARSHA ISPAT (P) LTD.</h3> COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MEERUT-I Versus AMRIT VARSHA ISPAT (P) LTD. - 2010 (252) E.L.T. 566 (Tri. - Del.) , 2011 (21) S.T.R. 702 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:Rectification of order based on subsequent Supreme Court judgments regarding quantum of penalty.Analysis:The case involves an application for rectification of an order dated August 27, 2008, passed in an Excise Appeal. The applicant contended that the Tribunal failed to consider certain Supreme Court decisions while deciding on the quantum of penalty. The Tribunal pronounced its order before the Supreme Court judgments were available, so it cannot be said that any mistake was made or that the Tribunal overlooked the Supreme Court decisions. The Department argued that once the Supreme Court decides a point of law, it is binding on all subordinate judicial authorities, and any decision contrary to the Supreme Court's ruling can be rectified. The Tribunal cited a case where it was held that decisions of the Supreme Court are binding, and any contrary decision can be rectified. However, it was emphasized that orders issued before Supreme Court pronouncements cannot be rectified; instead, the aggrieved party should follow the appropriate legal steps.The Tribunal concluded that in this case, there was no ground for rectifying the order as the decision was made before the Supreme Court judgments were available. Therefore, the application for rectification was rejected.
TaxTMI 