Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be sustained where the only discrepancy in the e-way bill was a wrong invoice number by one digit and no other defect in the goods or accompanying documents was found.
Analysis: The goods were intercepted in transit and the only discrepancy noticed was that the e-way bill mentioned invoice number 3096 instead of 3063. No discrepancy was found in the quality, quantity, or description of goods. Circular No. 64/38/2018 dated 14.09.2018 specifically states that proceedings under Section 129 may not be initiated where there is an error in one or two digits of the document number mentioned in the e-way bill. Such circulars are binding on the authorities.
Conclusion: The proceedings under Section 129 were unsustainable and the impugned orders were liable to be quashed in favour of the assessee.