Make-available test for technical services governs treaty taxation of centralized IT support receipts

Treaty taxation of IT support receipts depended on the make-available test under section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA: services qualify only if they transfer technical knowledge, skill, experience, know-how or processes so the recipient can use them independently later. Centralised support functions were found not to meet that test, so the receipts were not taxable as fees for included services and the addition on that basis was deleted. On the revisionary issue, the earlier Tribunal order was read as deleting the merits addition rather than quashing the section 263 proceedings, so the DRP's view was upheld. A separate year-wise verification issue was remanded for limited factual examination.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the DRP erred in holding that the Tribunal's earlier order did not invalidate the revisionary proceedings under section 263; (ii) whether the receipts were taxable as fees for included services or technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA; (iii) whether the addition of the alternative amount required remand because it pertained to a different year.

Issue (i): whether the DRP erred in holding that the Tribunal's earlier order did not invalidate the revisionary proceedings under section 263.

Analysis: The earlier order was read as deleting the additions in the merits appeal and not as expressly quashing the revisionary order. The directions under section 263 required the Assessing Officer to examine taxability of receipts and did not themselves create additions. On that basis, the DRP's view that the revisionary order had not been rendered void was accepted.

Conclusion: The assessee failed on this issue and the challenge to the DRP's view was rejected.

Issue (ii): whether the receipts were taxable as fees for included services or technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA.

Analysis: The decisive test was whether the services made available technical knowledge, skill, experience, know-how or processes to the recipient so that it could apply them independently later. The services were found to be centralized IT support and related functions that did not transfer such technical knowledge to the recipient. In this framework, the receipts did not fall within the treaty definition of fees for included services and were not taxable as technical services on that basis.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the addition was directed to be deleted.

Issue (iii): whether the addition of the alternative amount required remand because it pertained to a different year.

Analysis: The assessee's objection was that the receipts did not relate to the year under consideration. Since the matter turned on verification of the relevant year-wise linkage and supporting evidence, a limited remand to the Assessing Officer was considered appropriate.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded for limited verification and was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded substantially on the taxability question, failed on the revisionary-order challenge, and was sent back only for limited factual verification of the year-wise issue, resulting in a mixed outcome in favour of the assessee overall.

Ratio Decidendi: For treaty taxation of technical services, the decisive inquiry is whether the service recipient is enabled to apply the provider's technical knowledge, skill, experience, know-how or processes independently after the service is rendered; absent such make-available effect, the receipt is not taxable as fees for included services.

---