Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dredging services supplied to the Gujarat Maritime Board were covered by serial No. 3A of Notification No. 9/2017-IT (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended.
Analysis: Serial No. 3A exempted a composite supply of goods and services only where the value of goods did not exceed 25% of the composite supply and the supply was made to the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or local authority by way of an activity in relation to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality. The work described in the tender involved a composite supply, and the certificate on the 25% condition was found to be ambiguous and later acknowledged as a drafting error. The decisive requirement was the identity of the recipient. The Gujarat Maritime Board was found to be the owner and recipient of the dredging service, but it is neither the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory nor a local authority. The earlier reference to a government entity did not assist the applicant because that expression stood omitted from serial No. 3A by amendment. The question whether the activity related to a Panchayat function was therefore not pursued further.
Conclusion: The dredging service supplied to the Gujarat Maritime Board was not eligible for exemption under serial No. 3A of Notification No. 9/2017-IT (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended.