Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether denial of CENVAT credit on input services used for the impugned passenger-related collections was sustainable, and whether the matter required remand for verification of the tax actually paid by the appellant.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the principle that where tax has been accepted by the Revenue on an activity, credit linked to inputs or input services used for that activity cannot be denied merely on the ground that the underlying activity may not amount to manufacture or provision of service. Applying that principle, the credit claim could not be rejected outright. However, the record did not clearly establish whether the service tax paid by the appellant during the relevant period was equal to or greater than the CENVAT credit availed. The matter therefore required factual verification by the original authority.
Conclusion: The denial of credit was not finally sustained, and the matters were remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication and verification of tax payment vis-a -vis credit availed.
Ratio Decidendi: Once tax paid on an activity is accepted by the Revenue, credit on inputs or input services used for that activity cannot be denied solely because the underlying activity is alleged not to be taxable or not to amount to manufacture or provision of service.