Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the amended Section 16(5) of the Goods and Services Tax law so as to avail input tax credit despite filing GSTR-3B returns beyond the original due date, and whether the petitioner could be permitted to seek rectification before the appropriate authority.
Analysis: The disallowance of input tax credit had been made only on the ground that the returns in Form GSTR-3B were filed beyond the due date under the earlier regime. In view of the insertion of Section 16(5), the returns relating to the relevant tax period stood regularised by the extended cut-off date, and the petitioner could not be denied the benefit of the amendment. The proper course was to allow the petitioner to move the competent authority by filing an appropriate rectification application.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the amended provision and was permitted to apply for rectification before the appropriate authority.