TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Demand Order Quashed Due to Overstated ITC; Fresh Proceedings Allowed for 2019-20 Reassessment</h1> <h3>Kalishankar Sahoo Versus The Chief Commissioner of CT and GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others</h3> The HC quashed the demand order against the petitioner for the financial year 2019-20 due to an alleged overstatement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting ... Overstatement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - total tax reflected in the order is in excess of ₹ 50,00,000/-Interest and penalty are in addition to the same - HELD THAT:- Impugned proceeding against petitioner for financial year 2019-20 resulting in demand order under annexure-6 are all set aside and quashed. Petition disposed off. The High Court, in a judgment delivered by Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo, heard arguments from Mrs. K. Roy Choudhury for the Appellant and Mr. S. Mishra for the Respondent. The Appellant argued that the proceeding initiated against the petitioner for the financial year 2019-20 was based on an alleged overstatement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) at 9,00,982. It was highlighted that a previous order for the period July to September 2019 was not considered in the subsequent proceeding, leading to a reassessment for the overlapping period. The Respondent, represented by Mr. Mishra, agreed that the proceeding should be interfered with, allowing the Revenue to start afresh. Consequently, the court set aside and quashed the demand order against the petitioner for the financial year 2019-20, granting the Revenue the liberty to proceed in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
