Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was liable to be quashed for denial of opportunity of hearing through video conference, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The petition was entertained on the limited ground of breach of natural justice. The record showed that the petitioner had requested a hearing through video conference, but the request was not considered before passing the impugned assessment order. In these circumstances, the absence of a personal hearing through video conference amounted to non-adherence to the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh de novo order after granting an opportunity of hearing through video conference in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without granting a requested hearing through video conference, where such hearing is material to the decision-making process, is vitiated for breach of the principles of natural justice and is liable to be set aside with remand for fresh adjudication.