Explained cash deposits accepted, so addition under section 69A and consequential section 115BBE treatment were not sustained.

Cash deposits were treated as explained on the facts because the assessee supported them with pension receipts, prior cash withdrawals, medical exigencies and sale consideration from property and related assets. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not properly considered this explanation, so the addition under section 69A was not sustained and the consequential application of section 115BBE also failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of cash deposits in the bank account, and the consequential tax treatment under Section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were sustainable when the assessee explained the deposits as being sourced from pension, cash withdrawals, and sale consideration of property.

Analysis: The assessee explained the cash deposits by referring to pension receipts, prior cash availability, medical exigencies, and consideration received from sale of property and related assets. The explanation was supported by the surrounding circumstances noted in the record. The Tribunal found that these explanations were not properly considered by the lower authorities and that the cash deposits stood explained on the facts presented.

Conclusion: The addition under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not sustained, and the consequential application of Section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961 also failed. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

---