Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Stainless Steel Products (Quality Control Order), 2016 applied to the imported goods so as to require BIS certification, and whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were sustainable when the shipment was made before the order came into force.
Analysis: The shipment date was 13.01.2017 and the Bill of Lading bore a January 2017 date. The Quality Control Order came into force only on 07.02.2017. Under paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020, the date of import is reckoned with reference to the date of shipment or dispatch, and paragraph 9.11 of the Handbook of Procedure, 2015-20 treats the bill of lading date as the date of shipment for sea transport. Since the goods were shipped before the order became operative, the requirement of BIS certification was not attracted. The goods could not be treated as prohibited on that basis, and the resulting confiscation and penalty could not stand.
Conclusion: The Quality Control Order did not apply to the consignment, BIS certification was not required, and the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appellant obtained full relief.
Ratio Decidendi: For imported goods carried by sea, the relevant date for applying a subsequently enforced import control order is the shipment or bill of lading date, not the later date of arrival or clearance, where the governing trade policy so provides.