Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a demand order under Section 73 of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 can be sustained when no proper and prior show cause notice was issued and the taxpayer was served only with a summary in Form GST DRC-01 and an attachment to determination of tax.
Analysis: The governing scheme under Section 73 requires the proper officer to serve a show cause notice under sub-section (1), followed where applicable by a statement under sub-section (3), and thereafter to pass an order under sub-section (9) within the statutory time limit. Rule 142(1)(a) requires the summary in Form GST DRC-01 to accompany the notice, but the summary is not a substitute for the notice itself. The Court applied the earlier common decision on the same question and held that issuance of only the summary notice and the attachment to determination of tax did not amount to compliance with the statutory preconditions. The impugned order was also found unsustainable for want of proper adherence to the hearing requirements under Section 75(4).
Conclusion: The impugned demand order was illegal and was set aside, with liberty to the authorities to proceed afresh in accordance with law.