Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned GST assessment order required interference on the ground of breach of natural justice, and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration on the condition of payment of 10% of the disputed tax.
Analysis: The assessment arose from an audit under Section 65 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the order confirmed only certain discrepancies while dropping others. The writ petition was founded on denial of a fair opportunity, and the Court proceeded on consent of both sides to grant one further opportunity to the dealer to raise objections. In the circumstances, the impugned order and consequential demand were set aside, the matter was to proceed from the stage of show cause notice, and the petitioner was directed to deposit 10% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time, with adjustment of amounts already paid.
Conclusion: The impugned order was interfered with and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to payment of 10% of the disputed tax and compliance with the directions for filing objections and further consideration.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment is challenged on natural justice grounds and the Court grants a further opportunity to contest the proposal, the impugned order may be set aside and the proceedings restored to the notice stage subject to a reasonable pre-deposit condition.