Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal for non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit under the GST law was liable to be set aside, and whether the appeal should be restored for disposal on merits upon deposit.
Analysis: The petitioner's appeal had been dismissed solely for non-payment of the statutory pre-deposit. The order was also a common order passed in respect of different appellants without identity of cause of action or parties. As the petitioner expressed willingness to pay the pre-deposit immediately, the technical objection was treated as not warranting denial of a merits adjudication, provided the deposit was made within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The dismissal of the petitioner's appeal for non-payment of pre-deposit was set aside conditionally. Upon payment of the entire deposit within two weeks, the appeal is to be restored and decided on merits.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the limited extent of securing conditional restoration of the petitioner's statutory appeal and continuation of interim protection for a short period.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory appeal dismissed only for non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit may be restored when the assessee promptly undertakes to make the deposit, so that the matter can be adjudicated on merits rather than defeated on a technical default.