Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the condition in the anticipatory bail order requiring prior permission before travelling abroad should be modified and replaced with a requirement to intimate the Department.
Analysis: The petition sought modification of the travel restriction imposed in the anticipatory bail order on the ground that the show cause notice under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 had been finally adjudicated and no criminal prosecution had been recommended or initiated. In these circumstances, the restriction on foreign travel was considered unnecessary in its existing form. The respondent did not oppose modification and instead sought that the petitioner be required to inform the Department whenever he travelled abroad and furnish his contact details abroad.
Conclusion: The condition requiring prior permission of the learned CJM or Trial Court was modified. The petitioner is required to intimate the Department about foreign travel and furnish the contact number and address of residence abroad.