Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned customs adjudication order was liable to be set aside for violation of principles of natural justice and whether the matter required de novo adjudication.
Analysis: The Petitioner was not furnished the relied upon and non-relied upon documents before the impugned order was passed, and the absence of a hearing vitiated the adjudication process. Since the documents were subsequently supplied, the appropriate course was to annul the existing order and require the adjudicating authority to hear the parties afresh, permit production of additional material, and pass a reasoned order within a stipulated time.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for de novo adjudication after granting a fresh hearing to the Petitioners.
Final Conclusion: The Petition succeeded to the extent that the challenged adjudication was annulled and fresh proceedings were directed before the customs authority.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudication order passed without supplying relied upon material and without affording a proper hearing is vitiated for breach of natural justice and must be set aside for fresh decision after due hearing.