Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petition as moot; petitioner advised to seek regular bail after arrest.</h1> <h3>FASIL M & ANR. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ORS.</h3> In the SC judgment, the Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition as 'infructuous' due to the petitioner's arrest, rendering the anticipatory bail ... Seeking grant of bail - smuggling of cigarettes - challenge to summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 - it was held by High Court that 'After approaching this Court by filing a Writ Petition challenging the notice issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, which is not entertained by this Court, it is not proper on the part of the petitioners to approach this Court with a bail application.' HELD THAT:- The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as infructuous reserving liberty to the petitioner herein to seek regular bail, if so advised. In the Supreme Court judgment, presided over by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B. V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, the Court addressed a Special Leave Petition. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Subhash Chandran K.r, submitted that the petition for anticipatory bail had become 'infructuous' due to the petitioner's arrest. The Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition as 'infructuous,' while 'reserving liberty to the petitioner' to seek regular bail. Any pending applications were also disposed of.