Interference with adverse findings rejected where submissions were not properly argued and material was not placed before the appellate forum

The SC declined to interfere with the impugned order, noting that paragraphs 6 and 7 contained adverse findings against the appellant. The Court also found no basis to accept the grievance that certain submissions had not been considered, where the complaint was that the written submissions were never actually argued and the relevant material was not properly placed before the appellate forum. No case for interference was made out, and the appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether interference was warranted with the impugned order in view of the findings recorded therein and the grievance that certain submissions were not considered.

Analysis: The Court noted that paragraph Nos. 6 and 7 of the impugned order contained findings adverse to the appellant. It also recorded that the earlier submission regarding non-consideration of contentions did not persuade the Court to take a different view, particularly when the grievance was that the written submissions were never actually argued and the relevant material was not properly placed before the appellate forum.

Conclusion: No case for interference was made out, and the appeal was dismissed.

---