Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 18(2) read with Section 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could be sustained against a person shown only as an export procedure agent who prepared export documents and was not shown to be part of the exporting company or responsible for realisation of export proceeds.
Analysis: The appellant's role, as reflected from the record and the impugned order, was limited to preparing export documents for consideration. The material did not show that he was an exporter, a person in control of the company, or otherwise connected with the default in realisation of export proceeds. In the absence of evidence establishing his involvement in the contravention alleged against the company, penal action against him could not be justified.
Conclusion: The penalty imposed on the appellant could not be sustained and was liable to be set aside.