SC Dismisses Petition as 'Not Pressed'; Petitioner to Address HC Judgment Error First Before Returning to SC. The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition as 'not pressed' after the petitioner sought to address a factual inaccuracy in the HC's judgment. The SC ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
SC Dismisses Petition as "Not Pressed"; Petitioner to Address HC Judgment Error First Before Returning to SC.
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition as "not pressed" after the petitioner sought to address a factual inaccuracy in the HC's judgment. The SC noted that the petitioner should have first approached the HC for rectification. Consequently, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition to return to the HC, leading to the dismissal.
In the Supreme Court case presided over by Hon'ble Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, the petitioner, represented by Mr. Amar Gupta, Mr. Chanderkant Tyagi, and Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, sought to address a factual inaccuracy in the High Court's judgment, specifically in paragraph 10. The Court noted that the petitioner should have initially approached the High Court to rectify the alleged error. Consequently, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petition to return to the High Court. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition as "not pressed."
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
