Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (1) TMI 705 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Reassessment notice under Section 148 quashed for insolvent company after NCLT approved Resolution Plan extinguishes past dues The Gujarat HC quashed a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 against an insolvent company following NCLT approval of its Resolution Plan. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Reassessment notice under Section 148 quashed for insolvent company after NCLT approved Resolution Plan extinguishes past dues

                          The Gujarat HC quashed a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 against an insolvent company following NCLT approval of its Resolution Plan. The court held that once NCLT approves a Resolution Plan, all past dues are extinguished per the Supreme Court's Ghanashyam Mishra precedent. The tax authority lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessments after the Resolution Plan achieved finality, particularly since NCLAT had dismissed the authority's appeal, making the NCLT order final under Section 62 of the IBC.




                          1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                          The core legal questions considered in this judgment are:

                          • Whether the issuance of the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment for the Assessment Year 2016-17, is valid in light of the approved Resolution Plan by the NCLT.
                          • Whether the claims of the Income Tax Department, which were not part of the approved Resolution Plan, stand extinguished.
                          • Whether the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited versus Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited is applicable to the case.

                          2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                          Issue 1: Validity of the Notice under Section 148

                          • Relevant legal framework and precedents: The petitioner challenged the notice under Section 148 based on the decision in Ghanashyam Mishra, which states that once a Resolution Plan is approved by the NCLT, all past dues are extinguished.
                          • Court's interpretation and reasoning: The court agreed with the petitioner, noting that the NCLT's approval of the Resolution Plan extinguished the claims not included in the plan.
                          • Key evidence and findings: The NCLT approved the Resolution Plan on June 20, 2022, and the NCLAT upheld this decision, dismissing the Income Tax Department's appeal.
                          • Application of law to facts: The court applied the principles from Ghanashyam Mishra, concluding that the notice under Section 148 was without jurisdiction.
                          • Treatment of competing arguments: The respondent argued that they intended to challenge the NCLAT's decision in the Supreme Court. However, the court noted that the period for such an appeal had expired.
                          • Conclusions: The notice under Section 148 was quashed as it was issued without jurisdiction.

                          Issue 2: Extinguishment of Claims

                          • Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 31 of the IBC, as interpreted in Ghanashyam Mishra, provides that claims not part of the approved Resolution Plan are extinguished.
                          • Court's interpretation and reasoning: The court reiterated that the Resolution Plan binds all stakeholders, including tax authorities, and extinguishes claims not included.
                          • Key evidence and findings: The approved Resolution Plan included a provision that no reassessment or proceedings could be initiated for claims not part of the plan.
                          • Application of law to facts: The court found that the Income Tax Department's claims were not part of the approved plan and thus stood extinguished.
                          • Treatment of competing arguments: The respondent's argument of potential Supreme Court appeal was dismissed due to the expiry of the appeal period.
                          • Conclusions: The claims of the Income Tax Department not included in the Resolution Plan were extinguished.

                          3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                          • Preserve verbatim quotes of crucial legal reasoning: "Once the NCLT has approved the Resolution Plan, all the past dues shall stand extinguished and respondent-Authority could not have assumed the jurisdiction to re-open the assessment as the same would have achieved the finality."
                          • Core principles established: The approval of a Resolution Plan by the NCLT under the IBC extinguishes all claims not included in the plan, and no reassessment or proceedings can be initiated for such claims.
                          • Final determinations on each issue: The court quashed the notice under Section 148 as it was issued without jurisdiction, and the claims of the Income Tax Department not part of the Resolution Plan were extinguished.

                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found