Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to operate its bank account after expiry of the provisional attachment period under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The order proceeded on the basis that the maximum period of attachment under Section 83 had expired and that such attachment ends by operation of law after one year. In those circumstances, continued restraint on the bank account could not be sustained, except where the account was attached in relation to some other proceedings.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to operate its bank account unless the attachment related to proceedings other than the one for which the attachment order dated 26.06.2023 had been passed.