Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition; Upholds HC Decision Despite Outdated Precedent Due to Time Lapse and Complaint Filed.</h1> <h3>DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Versus PREM CHAND SINGH</h3> DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Versus PREM CHAND SINGH - TMI In the Supreme Court judgment, Justices M.M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar addressed a Special Leave Petition. The Court noted that the impugned judgment relied on the precedent set in 'Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India - (2018) 11 SCC 1.' However, they referenced the more recent legal principles established in 'Vijay Madandal Chaudhary & Ors. v. Union of India - 2022 SCC OnLine (SC) 929.' Despite finding the impugned judgment unsustainable in law, the Court chose not to interfere with the High Court's conclusion due to the elapsed time and the fact that a complaint had already been filed. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.