Appeals against PMLA attachment orders must be heard on criminal side, not civil side

The Bombay HC determined that appeals challenging attachment orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) should be entertained on the criminal side rather than civil side. The court held that while the Adjudicating Authority follows civil procedure for attachment proceedings, these proceedings are supplementary to money laundering offenses and aid the Special Court's ultimate determination of criminal liability. Since property attachment depends on the outcome of criminal trials under PMLA and involves criminal elements, appeals against such orders must be heard on the criminal side of the HC.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Whether the appeals challenging the impugned order should be entertained on the civil side or the criminal side of the High Court.
2. Interpretation and applicability of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) provisions concerning attachment and confiscation of property.
3. The nature of proceedings under PMLA and their classification as civil or criminal.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Jurisdiction of Appeals: Civil or Criminal Side

The primary issue addressed in the judgment is whether the appeals challenging the impugned order under the PMLA should be entertained on the civil or criminal side of the High Court. The appellant argued that the appeals should lie on the criminal side, while the respondent contended otherwise. The court analyzed various provisions of the PMLA and related precedents to determine the nature of proceedings. It concluded that since the proceedings for attachment and adjudication by the Adjudicating Authority are in aid of the trial of the offence, the appeal against such orders should be entertained on the criminal side. The court emphasized that the proceedings under PMLA, which ultimately result in the imposition of sentences or confiscation of property, inherently possess a criminal character.

2. Interpretation of PMLA Provisions

The court examined the provisions of the PMLA, highlighting its objective to prevent money laundering and provide for the confiscation of property involved in such activities. The Act is criminal in nature, as it prescribes punishment for money laundering under Sections 3 and 4. The court noted that the attachment of property is a supplementary provision to the offence of money laundering, with the ultimate determination of confiscation or release of property depending on the outcome of the trial. The court also discussed the role of the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal, which, despite having powers akin to a civil court, function within the framework of the criminal proceedings under the PMLA.

3. Nature of Proceedings: Civil or Criminal

The court addressed the nature of proceedings under the PMLA, considering the legislative intent and statutory provisions. It highlighted that the attachment of property under PMLA is governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, reinforcing the criminal nature of such proceedings. The court referenced various legal precedents and statutory provisions, including Section 65 of the PMLA, which applies the Code of Criminal Procedure to proceedings under the Act. The court concluded that the proceedings under PMLA, being criminal in nature, necessitate that appeals be filed and heard on the criminal side of the High Court.

In conclusion, the court determined that the appeals challenging the impugned order under the PMLA should be entertained on the criminal side, given the criminal nature of the proceedings and the legislative framework governing them. The court directed the appeal to be listed after the Christmas vacation, reinforcing its decision on the jurisdictional aspect of the appeals.

---