TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Reinstated: Pre-Deposit Compliance Enables Substantive Review of Case Without Additional Financial Burden</h1> <h3>Narendra Hirawat Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.</h3> HC allowed the appeal by setting aside the original dismissal due to pre-deposit compliance. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeal ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative remedy - 10% mandatory pre-deposit from the electronic cash ledger has been made - HELD THAT:- Since the pre-deposit has been made, the learned counsel for the petitioner is agreed that such a rigid stand should not have been adopted. This was a case of an inadvertent error and the dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal even after the error was corrected, is excessively disproportionate. The impugned order is set aside - the petitioner’s appeal restored before appellant authority - Now that the pre-deposit has already made, the appellate authority must consider and dispose of the petitioner’s appeal on merits and in accordance with law. The petitioner appealed against an order without indicating the pre-deposit amount. The petitioner later made the required pre-deposit, but the appeal was still dismissed. The High Court set aside the dismissal, restored the appeal, and directed the appellate authority to consider it on merits. No costs were awarded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
