Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-ST was available to LPG cylinders sold by the respondent to persons booking the mandapam, or whether the transaction amounted to taxable catering service.
Analysis: The respondent's consistent case was that it had not provided any catering service and had only sold LPG cylinders to clients booking the mandapam for functions. That factual assertion was not controverted by the revenue. On that basis, the transaction was treated as a sale of goods and not as catering service, so the exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST was held applicable. The reliance placed on the cited Supreme Court decision was found inapposite because the question there did not concern sale of goods for the purpose of that notification.
Conclusion: The exemption was rightly extended to the respondent, and the revenue's challenge failed.