Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additions in block assessment could be sustained on the basis of statements recorded on oath under section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the assessees had discharged the burden of showing that such admissions were incorrect.
Analysis: A statement recorded during search under section 132(4) is admissible evidence and has evidentiary value in proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961. An admission is an important piece of evidence, though not conclusive, and the person making it can show that it is wrong or obtained by coercion or undue influence. Once the statements were recorded on oath, the burden shifted to the assessees to rebut the admission with cogent material. The assessees did not plead coercion or undue influence and did not produce material to displace the admission regarding the total investment in construction.
Conclusion: The addition based on the statements under section 132(4) was rightly restored, and the issue was decided against the assessees and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The appeals did not succeed, and the Revenue's stand on the disputed addition was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A voluntary admission recorded on oath during search proceedings is admissible and carries evidentiary weight, and it can be displaced only by the assessee by producing convincing material showing it to be incorrect.